Before the Hon'ble
Central Administrative
Tribunal Hyderabad:
O.A.No.
OF 2006
Between:
__________________
Applicant
Versus
__________________
Respondents
Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative
Tribunals Act
Respectfully Submits that:
Details of application:
1. Particulars of
Orders Against Which this Application is Made:
That this application is made against the action, rather inaction of
the respondents whereby they are not conferring the temporary status
on the applicant wef __, ie; on completion of 206 days in a given
calender year and not granting other consequential benefits as
prayed for hereinbelow.
The application is also against the arbitrary and unconstitutional
clause in the Casual Labourers (Grant of Temporary Status and
Regularisation) Scheme of Government of India, 1993 (A-1).
2. Jurisdiction of
Tribunal:
That the applicant declares that the subject matter of this
application is within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Tribunal and
it is competent to issue the directions to the respondents for full
compliance.
3. Limitation:
That the applicant further declares that the application is within
the limitation period as prescribed in section 21 of the Central
Administrative Tribunals Act 1985.
4. Facts of the
Case:
(4.1) That the applicant submits
that he was initially engaged by the respondent department as
____ wef ____ (A-2 & A-3) in the exigencies of service
initially for spell of one months thereafter giving extensions of 29
days and in such manner the applicant has completed more than 206
days in any given year as per the details annexed as Annexure A-4.
It is humbly submitted that the applicant was engaged to perform the
duties of regular nature and the applicant was recruited against the
existing permanent post.
(4.2) That ever since the appointment of the
applicant, the applicant is performing his duties with the utmost
devotion and sincerity to the entire satisfaction of his superior
officers.
(4.3) That it is also pertinent to
mention here that the appointment of the applicant is against the
permanent sanctioned post and the sanction for the said post is
being granted by the competent authority from time to time (A-5).
It is also respectfully submitted that the duties being
performed by the applicant are same and similar to the duties of the
regular hands.
(4.4) That with the efflux of time the
applicnt has got vested rights to be conferred upon a temporary
status in accordance with the rules and regulations and thereafter
to be granted consequential benefits as well as to be regularised.
(4.5) That accordingly the applicant as well
as the other similarly situated persons have applied on :______
(A-6) to the respondent department to grant temporary status as well
as other consequential benefits. The said representation of
the applicant was further routed to the appropriate authority by the
respondent department. (A-7).
(4.6) That however, the competent authority
has turned down the representation of the applicant on :______ (A-8)
and other similarly situated persons with the objection that the
temporary status could be granted to only those casual workers who
were in employment on the date of issue of the OM (A-1).
(4.7) That it is also pertinent to submi here
with that in the meantime some of the similarly situated persons
have filed an OA No. :______ titled as :______ Vs :______,
wherein this Hon'ble Tribunal was pleased to direct the respondents
to consider the representations of the applicants therein. As
such the applicant was also waiting for the outcome of the
consideration of the representations of those applicants.
(4.8) That it is also pertinent to submit
herewith that the respondent department has conferred benefits
envisaged as under the annexure A-1 to the similarly situated
persons at :______ (A-9) and at :______ (A-10). Thus the
applicant can not be discriminated upon in such manner for grant of
temporary status as well as the other consequential benefits.
5. Grounds for Relief:
That the applicant seeks the indulgence of this Hon'ble Tribunal on
the following grounds amongst others, each one of which is without
prejudice to and independent of other:
(5.1) That the clause 3 of the impugned
OM (A-1) and the impugned orderA-8 are malafide, arbitrary,
discriminatory and issued in utter violation of rules, regulations,
and is violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India
and natural justice.
(5.2) That the clause 3 of the Scheme (A-1) is
arbitrary and unconstitutional and ultravires to the extent it makes
the scheme applicable only to those casual labourers who were in
employment on the date of issuance of the said scheme, ie; :______..
(5.3) That the impugned cut-off date is
unconstitutional and ultra vires and creates unreasonable
classification between the Casual Labourers and has no nexus with
the object of granting temporary status to the similarly situated
casual labourers so as to avoid their exploitation and unfair labour
practice.
(5.4) That the respondent Union of India has
created distinction between the Casual Labourers which is not based
on any intelligible differentia which can distinguish Casual
Labourers grouped together for the purpose of extending the benefits
under the Scheme and has no nexus with the object of stopping unfair
labour practice sought to be achieved, by the Scheme of 1993.
(5.5) That the differentia on which the
classification is founded is lacking in rational relation to the
object sought to be achieved by the impugned scheme and the order
under challenge.
(5.6) That the impugned clause does not
subserve the purpose sought to be achieved.
(5.7) That the classification in the
impugned definition is against well settled principles laid down by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court and other Hon'ble High Courts and this
Hon'ble Tribunal in catena of cases.
(5.8) That otherwise also it was incumbent
upon the respondents to review and revise theit strength position of
regular and permanent employee as the applicant has continued for a
considerably long period justifying his regularisation against the
regular post which is existing in the respondent department as is
clear from A-5.
(5.9) That the respondent Union of India
to is arbitrarily not amending or relaxing the provision of the
Clause No. 4 under the provisions of clause No. 11 of the said
Scheme, so as to make it applicable to all casual employees/labourers
who have been engaged after the date of issuance of this scheme so
as to bring the scheme in consonance with the Articles 14 and 16 of
the Constitution of India;
(5.10) That the respondents are estopped due to their own
act, deed and conduct. The principle of promissory Estopple applies
against the respondents.
(5.11) That the impugned order of the respondents is
also against the well settled principles laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India and this Hon'ble Tribunal in catena of cases.
6. Details of Remedies
Exhausted:
That the
applicant has exhausted all the remedies available to him.
Moreover, the matter being of urgent nature, the applicant has no
other way but to approach this Hon'ble Tribunal for speedy and
efficacious remedy for staying and quashing the impugned order.
7. Matters not
Previously Filed or Pending with any Other Court:
The applicant further declare that he has not filed any application,
writ petition or suit regarding the matter in respect of which this
application has been made in any court, other authority or any other
Bench of this Hon'ble Tribunal. No such application, writ petition
or suit is pending before any of them.
8. Reliefs Sought:
That in view of the facts in para 4 above and the grounds in para 5
supra, your Lordship's humble applicant prays for the following
reliefs:
(a) Quash the impugned
action of the respondents whereby they are not conferring the
temporary status on the applicant wef __, being arbitrary, malafide,
discriminatory and illegal;
(b) Direct the
respondents to confer temporary status on the applicant wef __, ie;
on which date the applicant has completed more than minimum
requisite numbers of days;
(c) Direct the
respondents to pay wages at daily rates with reference to the
minimum of the pay scale (including DA, HRA and CCA and taking into
account the benefits of increments at the same rate as applicable to
a Group D employee for calculating pro-rata wages for every one year
of service) for a corresponding regular Group D officials wef __
alongwith arrears and interest thereon @ 18% pa till realisation of
the whole payments;
(d) Direct the respondents
grant the leave to the applicants on a pro-rata basis at the rate of
one days for every 10 days of work as well as maternity/paternity
leave;
(e) Direct the respondents
to treat the applicant at par with the Group D employees wef __
after granting temporary status wef __ and counting three years
therefrom; for the purpose of contribution to the General Provident
Fund and also pay festival advance etc;
(f) Direct the
respondents to pay productivity linked bonus to the applicant;
(g) Quash the Clause 3 of
the Department of Personnel & Training Casual Labourers (Grant
of Temporary Status and Regularisation) Scheme of Government of
India, 1993 to the extent it is made applicable to the casual
labourers in employment of the Ministries/Departments of Government
of India and their attached and subordinate officers, "on the
date of issue of these orders", being arbitrary, irrational and
unconstitutional by applying the principle of severability;
(h) Direct the
respondents to regularise the services of the applicant against the
regular Group D posts against they are working for considerably long
number of years;
(i) Direct the
respondent Union of India to amend or relax the provision of the
Clause No. 4 under the provisions of clause No. 11 of the said
Scheme, so as to make it applicable to all casual employees/labourers
who have been engaged after the date of issuance of this scheme so
as to bring the scheme in consonance with the Articles 14 and 16 of
the Constitution of India;
(j) Direct the
respondents to produce all the records of the case alongwith their
reply for perusal by this Hon'ble Tribunal;
(k) Allow the cost of
this application to the applicant.
(l) Pass such other
orders or reliefs as deemed fit and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case in the favour of the applicant and against
the respondent.
AND FOR
THIS ACT OF KINDNESS, THE HUMBLE APPLICANT AS IN DUTY BOUND, SHALL
EVER PRAY.
9. Interim Orders:
No interim orders are being prayed for at this time.
10. N.A.
11. Particulars of Postal
Order Towards Application Fees:
1. Postal Order Nos::______
Dated::______
2. Issuing P.O. : :______
3. Amount Rs : 50/- [Rs fifty only]
4. Payable at: :______
12. List of Enclosures:
As per
index.
Applicants
______
Through Advocate
Verification:
I,
_______, do hereby verify that the contents of paras 1 to 5
are true to my personal knowledge and paras 6 to 12 believed to be
true on legal advice and that I have not suppressed any material
fact.
Verified
here at Hyderabad this ________
Applicant
Before the Hon'ble Central Administrative
Tribunal at Hyderabad
OA.No.
of 2006
Applicant
Versus
Respondents
Affidavit in support of application under Section 19 of the
Central Administrative Tribunal Act 1985.
I, ______,
do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under :-
1. That the
accompanying application has been prepared under my instructions.
2. That the contents of
paras 1 to 12 of the O.A. are correct and true to the best of my
knowledge.
3. That I further
solemnly affirm and declare that this affidavit of mine is true, no
part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therein.
Affirmed
at Hyderabad this the ______ .
Deponent
Before the Hon'ble Central Administrative
Tribunal at Hyderabad
OA.No.
of 2006
Applicant
Versus
Respondents
Index
Sl No
|
Annx
|
Particulars of Documents
|
Pages
|
1.
|
|
I. P. O. for Rs 50/-
|
1
|
2.
|
|
Memo of Parties
|
1
|
3.
|
|
O. A.
|
2
|
4.
|
|
Affidavit
|
|
5.
|
A-1
|
|
|
6.
|
A-2
|
|
|
7.
|
A-3
|
|
|
8.
|
|
MA
|
|
9.
|
|
Affidavit
|
|
10.
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
Hyderabad
Applicant
_______
Through, Advocate
Before the Hon'ble Central Administrative
Tribunal Hyderabad
M.A.No.
of 2006
in
OA.No.
of 2006
Applicants
Versus
Respondents/Non-applicants
M. A. under Rule 4 (5) (a) of Central Administrative Tribunal
(Procedure) Rules 1987
Respectfully Sheweth:
1. That the applicants
have filed the above mentioned O. A. jointly.
2. That on perusal of
the above O. A. and documents attached therewith it is amply evident
that all the applicants have common cause of action and common
nature of relief prayed for by them and are desirous of joining in a
single application as they have a common interest in the matter.
3. That interest of
justice demands that the applicants are allowed to file the O. A. in
the jointly in the interest of justice.
4. It is therefore,
most respectfully prayed that this application may be allowed in the
interest of justice and the applicants may be allowed to file the
present OA jointly. Such other orders be also passed as deemed
fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
Hyderabad
Applicant
______
Through, Advocate
Verification:
I, ______,
do hereby verify that the contents of para 1 to _______ are true on
legal advice and that have not suppressed any material fact.
Hyderabad
Applicant
______
Through, Advocate
Before the Hon'ble Central Administrative
Tribunal Hyderabad
M.A.No.
of 2006
in
OA.No.
of 2006
Applicant
Versus
Respondents/Non-applicants
Affidavit in support of M. A. under Rule 4 (5) (a) of Central
Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules 1987
I,
_______, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-
1. That I am duly
authorised by the other applicants to file the present MA and am
fully conversant with the facts of the case.
2. That the
accompanying M. A. has been drafted under my instructions.
3. That the contents of
paras 1 to 4 of the M. A. are correct and true to the best of my
knowledge.
4. That I further
solemnly affirm and declare that this affidavit of mine is correct
and true, no part of it is false and nothing material has been
concealed therein.
Affirmed
at Hyderabad this the_______.
DEPONENT
Before the Hon'ble Central Administrative
Tribunal Hyderabad
M.A.No.
of 2006
in
OA.No.
of 2006
Between:
Applicants
Versus
Respondents/Non-applicants
M. A. under Rule 4 (5) (b) of Central Administrative Tribunal
(Procedure) Rules 1987
Respectfully Sheweth:
1. That the
applicants have filed the above mentioned O. A. jointly.
2. That on
perusal of the above O. A. and documents attached therewith it is
amply evident that all the members of the applicant association have
common cause of action and common nature of relief prayed for by
them and are desirous of joining in a single application as they
have a common interest in the matter.
3. That interest
of justice demands that the applicants are allowed to file the O. A.
through their Association in the interest of justice.
4. It is therefore,
most respectfully prayed that this application may be allowed in the
interest of justice and the applicants may be allowed to file the
present OA through their Association. Such other orders be
also passed as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances
of the case.
Hyderabad
Applicant
_______
Through, Advocate
Verification:
I,
_______, do hereby verify that the contents of para 1 to _______are
true on legal advice and that have not suppressed any material fact.
Hyderabad
Applicant
_______
Through, Advocate
Before the Hon'ble Central Administrative
Tribunal Hyderabad
M.A.No.
of 2006
in
OA.No.
of 2006
Applicant
Versus
Respondents/Non-applicants
Affidavit in support of M. A. under Rule 4 (5) (b) of Central
Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules 1987
I,
_______, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-
1. That I am duly
authorised by the other applicants to file the present MA and am
fully conversant with the facts of the case.
2. That the
accompanying M. A. has been drafted under my instructions.
3. That the contents of
paras 1 to 4 of the M. A. are correct and true to the best of my
knowledge.
4. That I further
solemnly affirm and declare that this affidavit of mine is correct
and true, no part of it is false and nothing material has been
concealed therein.
Affirmed at Hyderabad this the_______.
DEPONENT
|